|  e-ISSN: 2791-8238

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi | Rumeli Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 2023, Cil. 3(4) 1-22

2023.4.01. Ceylan, V. K. & Akar Vural, R.: Self-Assessment of Computational Thinking Skill: A Scale Development Study / Bilgi işlemsel düşünme öz değerlendirme ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması

Veysel Karani CEYLAN Ruken AKAR VURAL

ss. 1 - 22   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8217317   |  Makale No: read.2023.001

Yayın tarihi: Ağustos 05, 2023  |   Okunma Sayısı: 71  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 125


Özet

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable scale to measure computational thinking skills in children aged between 11 and 13. The scale development process began with an in-depth literature review to determine the operational definition of computational thinking. In addition, 17 teachers working in the field were interviewed to determine how the concept is used in practice. Based on the literature and interview data, the dimensions of algorithmic thinking, abstraction, reusability, automation, generalization, parsing, and parallelization were identified as sub-dimensions of the draft scale. The item pool was initially set at 40 items, and the opinions of subject experts were sought for content and face validity. After this stage, the item pool was reduced to 36 items. The pilot study of the draft scale form was administered to a total of 272 students. After the pilot application of the draft scale form, exploratory factor analysis was first used in the analysis phase. When the factor relations of the scale were determined as a result of repeated analysis, 16 items were removed from the scale, leaving 20 items in the final form. Cronbach alpha for internal consistency and reliability values indicated sufficient reliability values. Confirmatory factor analysis was then used to check the validity of the factors obtained. The compatibility of the 5 factors obtained as a result of EFA with the items was tested in CFA. As a result of the analysis, five factors were obtained: algorithmic thinking (5 items), parallelization (5 items), decomposition (4 items), automation (3 items), and abstraction (3 items) scale structure consisting of 20 items.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Scale development , computational thinking, factor analyse


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
VURAL, V.K.C.A. (2023). 2023.4.01. Ceylan, V. K. & Akar Vural, R.: Self-Assessment of Computational Thinking Skill: A Scale Development Study / Bilgi işlemsel düşünme öz değerlendirme ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması . Rumeli Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 1-22. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8217317

Harvard
VURAL, V. (2023). 2023.4.01. Ceylan, V. K. & Akar Vural, R.: Self-Assessment of Computational Thinking Skill: A Scale Development Study / Bilgi işlemsel düşünme öz değerlendirme ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması . Rumeli Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), pp. 1-22.

Chicago 16th edition
VURAL, Veysel Karani CEYLAN Ruken AKAR (2023). "2023.4.01. Ceylan, V. K. & Akar Vural, R.: Self-Assessment of Computational Thinking Skill: A Scale Development Study / Bilgi işlemsel düşünme öz değerlendirme ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme çalışması ". Rumeli Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3 (4):1-22. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8217317.

Kaynakça

    References

    Ambrosio, A. P., Almeida, L. S., Macedo, J., & Franco, A. (2014). Exploring core cognitive skills of computational thinking. Psychology of programming interest group. Annual conference 2014 (PPIG 2014) (ss. 25–34).

    Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological Testing. (6th ed.). New York: McMillan.

    Armoni, M., Meerbaum-Salant, O., & Ben-Ari, M. (2015). From scratch to “real” programming. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14, 4.

    Arrindell, W. A., & Van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observer-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 165–178.

    Barbera, J., Naibert, N., Komperda, R., & Pentecost, T. C. (2021). Clarity on Cronbach’s  Alpha use. Journal of Chemical Education. 98, 257-258. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00183

    Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2, 48-54.

    Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education-implications for policy and practice. Seville: Join Research Center (European Commission). 21.02.2018, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC104188/jrc104188_computhinkreport.pdf.

    Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting. British Columbia: Vancouver.

    Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 584–594. [6]

    Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of Psychological Testing. (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row Pub. 

    Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures. Educucational  Psychology  Measurement, 64 (3), 391−418.

    Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J. (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists. 12.12.2018, http://people.cs.vt.edu/~kafura/ CS6604/Papers/CT-What-And-Why.pdf

    Davey, A., & Savla, J. (2010). Statistical Power Analysis With Missing Data. A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

    Denning, P. J. (2007). Computing is a natural science. Commun. ACM, 50, 13-18.

    Csizmadia, A., Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Humphreys, S., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2015). Computational Thinking A Guide for Teachers. 02.01.2019, http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/424545

    Çokluk, Ö. S., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: Spss ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

    Demir, E., Saatçioğlu, Ö., & İmrol, F. (2016). Uluslararası Dergilerde Yayımlanan Eğitim Araştırmalarının Normallik Varsayımları Açısından İncelenmesi. Curr Res Educ. 2(3). 130-148

    DeVellis, R. F.(1991).  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.

    Edelson, D. (2002). Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. 12.12.2018. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13170

    Erkuş, A. (2016). Psikolojide Ölçme ve Ölçek Geliştirme I: Temel Kavramlar ve İşlemler. Pegem akademi. (3. Baskı). Ankara

    Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.

    Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor Analysis in The Development and Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 286–299.

    Ford, J. K., MacCullum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The Application of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Applied Psychology: A Critical Review And Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291–314.

    García-peñalvo, F. J., Rees, A. M., Hughes, J., & Vermeersch, J. (2016). A survey of resources for introducing coding into schools. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’16), 19–26.

    Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.. ISBN-10: 089859202X

    Gouws, L., Bradshaw, K., & Wentworth, P. (2013). First year student performance in a test for computational thinking. Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on - SAICSIT’13. doi:10.1145/2513456.2513484 

    Grover, S., Cooper, L., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.

    Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W.F.(1988). The releationship of the sample size to the stability of component patternes. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.

    Guzdial, M., Kay, A., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2019). Computational Thinking Should Be Good Thinking. Communications of the ACM, November 2019, Vol. 62 No. 11, Pages 28-3010.1145/3363181

    Gülbahar, Y., Kert, S. B., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2019). Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme Becerisine Yönelik Öz Yeterlik Algısı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması . Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) , 10 (1) , 1-29 . DOI: 10.16949/turkbilmat.385097

    Hinkle, D.E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs., S. G. (1981). Applied Statistics For The Behavioral Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    ISTE (2016). Computational Thinking (Learner). ISTE website, Computational Thinking, date of access: 12.08.2017. https://iste.org/standards/computational-thinking

    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling With The SIMPLIS Command Language. New York: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Karasar, N. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. İstanbul: Nobel Yayin Dağitim .

    Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2015). Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme Nedir ve Nasıl öğretilir?.3th International Instructional Technology and Teacher Education Symposium. Trabzon, Türkiye, September 9 – 11, 2015.

    Kalelioğlu, F., Gülbahar, Y., Akçay, S., & Doğan, D. (2014). Curriculum Integration Ideas for Improving the Computational Thinking Skills of Learners through Programming via Scratch. The 7th International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives. Istanbul University, Turkey, September 22-25.

    Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide To Factor Analysis. Routledge Press.

    Lockheed, M. E. (1985). Women, girls, and computers: A first look at the evidence. Sex Roles, 13, 115–122. Access date: 12.11.2018, https://link.springer.com/article /10.1007/ BF00287904.

    MacCallum, R. C., & Tucker, L.R. (1991). Representing sources of error in the common factor model: Implications for theory and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 109(3), 502.

    Mertler, C.A., & Vannatta, R.A. (2005). Advanced And Multivariate Statistical Methods: Practical Application And Interpretation. (Third edition). United States: Pyrczak Publishing.

    Mulaik, S.A. (1990). Blurring the Distinctions Between Component Analysis and Common Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 53-59.

    Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill

    Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Bringing computational thinking into high school mathematics and science classrooms. Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners. The International Conference of The Learning Sciences (ICLS) (ss. 705–712).

    Özmen, B., & Altun, A. (2014). Undergraduate students’ experiences in programming Difficuities and obstacles. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, July 2014, 5(3)

    Papert, S. (1980). Computers For Children. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, Inc. Publishers / New York

    Pett, M.A., Lackey, N.R., & Sullivan, J.J. (2003) Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412984898

    Repenning, A., Webb, D., & Ioannidou, A. (2010). Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium On Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ‘10) (pp. 265–269). New York, NY: ACM Press.

    Scherer, R.F., Wiebe, F.A., Luther, D.C., & Adams J.S. (1988), Dimensionality of Coping: Factor Stability Using the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62, 763-770.

    Schwartz, D.L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.

    Seiter, L., & Foreman, B. (2013). Modeling the learning progressions of computational thinking of primary grade students. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 59-66. ACM

    Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). CT: The developing definition. Erişim Tarihi:14.11.2018 http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/356481/.

    Snook, S. C., & Gorsuch, R.L. (1989). Common factor analysis vs. component analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106,148–154.

    Steiger, J.H. (1990). Some Additional Thoughts on Components, Factors, and Factor Indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 41-45.

    Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied Multivariate Statistics For The Social Sciences (Fifth edition). United States: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

    Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5. Baskı). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M., J. (2002). Experimental Design and Data Analysis For Biologists. United States: Cambridge University Press

    Werner, L., Campe, S., & Denner, J. (2012). Children learn computer science concepts via Alice game programming. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium On Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '12) (pp. 427–432). New York, NY: ACM.

    Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33–36.

    Wing, J.M. (2014). Computational Thinking Benefits Society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing, 2014.

    Yeni, Z. (2017). Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünmede Değerlendirme. Y. Gülbahar (Editör). Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünmeden Programlamaya (341-356). Ankara. Pegem Akademi

    Yıldız Durak, H., & Sarıtepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the Relation Between Computational Thinking Skills and Various Variables with the Structural Equation Model. Computers & Education, 116 (2018), 191-202.